Re: ontape vs onbar

Posted in 2004

David Williams — Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:54:18 +0100 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

"Five Cats" <cats_spam@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message news:6vrpyuEy+EfAFwG$@[127.0.0.1]... > In message <c5hi04$kbr$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>, David Williams > <djw@smooth1.fsnet.co.uk> writes > > > >I also meant to add that ontape is only useful for small systems when doing > >a level 0 archive > >prior to an upgrade as this is simpler to restore when upgrading. > > How small is small? That is a judgement call. > > > > > > > > > -- > Five Cats > Email to: cats_spam at uk2 dot net