Fragmentation on a column type datetime

We fragment a table by expression on a column of datetime type. By using set explain on, I saw that for a transaction witch makes reference only with the column of fragmentation, the access is sequentel of all the table. It is a bug Informix ? So yes, It's possible to circumvent it Thank you very match

Please include the where clause of the fragmentation and the where clause of the query. "mohamed.afe...." <mohamed.afeilal@ To: ids@iiug.org meditel.ma> cc: Sent by: Subject: Fragmentation on a column type datetime [163] forum.subscriber@ iiug.org 01/29/2003 02:16 PM We fragment a table by expression on a column of datetime type. By using set explain on, I saw that for a transaction witch makes reference only with the column of fragmentation, the access is sequentel of all the table. It is a bug Informix ? So yes, It's possible to circumvent it Thank you very match