Re: Date to Time conversion

>mdstock@informix.com wrote >>dennisp@informix.com wrote: >>> >>> (Hmmm ... a lot of DATE and DATETIME questions are coming up. I >>> wonder if Y2K > has anything to do with it ...) >Nah.... that's a LONG way off...., isn't it? :-) >Cheers, >-- >Mark. An interesting one this. In an attempt to allay the fears of my senior management I came up with the following Y2K solution :- Since most mere mortals believe 2k = 2000 there has been a lot of panic regarding the so-called Y2K problem. As we in IT know, 2k is in actuality 2048. This being the case, surely we have another 49-odd years before we need to worry ? Just a suggestion ..... Regards Glyn Balmer BICC Cables Limited Erith UK Kent