Re: Informix Directions

Garrett Sienkiewicz wrote: > > But, it is imperative to get Informix's name in front of upper level > management in a positive light. There has to be articles in WSJ and > Computerworld that talk about good things at Informix. Informix must have > that mind share to return to competitiveness. Interesting that you say WSJ. That's one place Informix hasn't placed any advertisements. IMHO, the ads they do run wouldn't work in that type of forum. But we all agree that there is a problem with Informix's marketing. Only Informix, hasn't agreed with us. -- #include <std_disclaimer.h> /* Mike Segel (MS385) */ #include <No_Spam.h> #ifdef OFFENDED_BY_CONTENT The author takes no responsibility for this post. Any resemblence to a coherent rational thought is purely coincidence. -The Management. #endif ***************************** Due to AGIS's Refusal to Act Responsibly We are blocking all of their domains at the packet level. This block will exist until AGIS modifies their policies to conform to existing RFCs and net community standards. We encourage all ISPs and domain holders to do the same. *****************************