Thomas J. Girsch wrote in message <363f83a4.0@news.one.net>...
>What's wrong with onstat -g act?
>
>Or the sysmaster database, for that matter?
>
>The Wilcoxons wrote in message <71nr8s$lo6$1@nw003t.infi.net>...
>>Here is a script we have used to track 'active' threads in IDS 7.2x . We
>>have it linked to onstat-u and onstat-ur so we can have it repeat or not.
It's a matter of personal taste. I like the statistics it gathers easily
from onstat -u and I also see when a checkpoint is active when the timer
ticks (since it lets the onstat header through).
Yes, an application pulling from sysmaster could produce a better, cleaner
output. This intended as a simple tool to provide a lot of information at a
glance (the user, locks, reads, writes, ...).
S.W.