Re: Alarm for New virtual shared memory segment
Posted in 2010
Topics: Server Administration, Triggers, Constraints & Referential Integrity
Art,
Thank you. I would consider it a significant event because if I see the
Server Dynamically adding new virtual memory segments that means I need to
tweak SHMVIRTSIZE and add more memory to the initial segment.
--David
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Art Kagel <art.kagel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately it is not considered a significant "event" for the
> alarmprogram. The only way would be to poll the message log for the string.
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel
> Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> IIUG Board of Directors (art@iiug.org)
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
> and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
> other organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly,
> or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other
> individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those
> of the entities themselves.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Dave <in4mixdba@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if there is any way for Informix to alert us if it
>> "Dynamically allocated new virtual shared memory segment". I tried
>> getting the ALARMPROGRAM to alert, though it seems that this action
>> does not trigger the ALARMPROGRAM. Any ideas?
>>
>> 16:17:26 Requested shared memory segment size rounded from 640000KB>> to 655360KB
>> 16:17:26 Shared memory segment will use large pages with intimate>> shared memory (ISM) if available
>> 16:17:27 Dynamically allocated new virtual shared memory segment
>> (size 655360KB)
>> 16:17:27 Memory sizes:resident:9961472 KB, virtual:20185088 KB, no>> SHMTOTAL limit>>
>> --David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Informix-list mailing list
>> Informix-list@iiug.org
>> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
>>
>
>
On Jun 9, 9:05 pm, Informix DBA <in4mix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Art,
>
> Thank you. I would consider it a significant event because if I see the
> Server Dynamically adding new virtual memory segments that means I need to
> tweak SHMVIRTSIZE and add more memory to the initial segment.
>
> --David
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Art Kagel <art.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Unfortunately it is not considered a significant "event" for the
> > alarmprogram. The only way would be to poll the message log for the string.
>
> > Art
>
> > Art S. Kagel
> > Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> > IIUG Board of Directors (a...@iiug.org)
>
> > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
> > and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
> > other organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly,
> > or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other
> > individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those
> > of the entities themselves.
>
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Dave <in4mix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hello,
>
> >> I was wondering if there is any way for Informix to alert us if it
> >> "Dynamically allocated new virtual shared memory segment". I tried
> >> getting the ALARMPROGRAM to alert, though it seems that this action
> >> does not trigger the ALARMPROGRAM. Any ideas?
>
> >> 16:17:26 Requested shared memory segment size rounded from 640000KB> >> to 655360KB
> >> 16:17:26 Shared memory segment will use large pages with intimate> >> shared memory (ISM) if available
> >> 16:17:27 Dynamically allocated new virtual shared memory segment
> >> (size 655360KB)
> >> 16:17:27 Memory sizes:resident:9961472 KB, virtual:20185088 KB, no> >> SHMTOTAL limit>
> >> --David
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Informix-list mailing list
> >> Informix-l...@iiug.org
> >>http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
fix SHMVIRTSIZE or the developer! ;-)