Re: Suggested Changes to 4gl

Posted in 1992

Andrew Burt — 15 Dec 92 15:05:08 GMT — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

In <1992Dec14.215058.24334@netcom.com> pmahler@netcom.com (Paul Mahler) writes: >Hello the net, >So far the only responses I have received have been suggestions >for changes to the input array statement. Is everyone really >this satisfied with 4gl? Is there nothing else we can >complain about? I have a two page list! I just haven't typed it in yet. (Something about project deadlines, etc...) I'll try to push it up in the queue on the off chance it might do some good. No, count me VERY disappointed with 4gl. -- Andrew Burt aburt@du.edu "But if he was dying he wouldn't bother to carve "Aaaaargh", he'd just say it."