Re: Security options at different SQL-Databases with ODBC - who is best ?

volker.koenig@Duesseldorf.netsurf.de (Volker Koenig) wrote: :TANSTAAFL ;-) Should have been TINSTAAFL although I relise your spelling is the right one (the one used at least). :If you "need" a very easy-to-use develpopement tool like ODBC you will have to :pay the money you save with your one hand with your other hand. That is the one thing I'll never accept. When things can be solved, and solved at a low price, I will never accept having to pay a high price. I will of course accept it until it is solved, the point is I will do something to either solve it myself or make the appropriate parties solve it. In this case it not only can be done, but must be done, and I am sure will be done within a reasonable timeframe. Discussions like these are important to further such solutions because they make those who need to solve them aware that the users are conserned. :Bis denne, : Volker. :---------------------------------------------------------------------- :Ich habe Londo das Leben gerettet, weil im All alles Leben heilig ist. :Aber wenn derjenige, den man gerettet hat, diesen Glauben nicht mit :einem teilt, hat man der Gegenwart gedient, indem man die Zukunft :geopfert hat. (Lenier in Babylon 5) :---------------------------------------------------------------------- Als *alles* Leben nicht heilig ist hat man Londo gedient, und vieleich andre Menschen. Gegenwart und Zukunft kommt nur im spiele durch andre Menschen. Nils.Myklebust@idg.no NM Data AS, P.O.Box 9090 Gronland, N-0133 Oslo, Norway My opinions are those of my company