Re: INFORMIX WISH LIST

Michael Segel wrote: [snipping happened here] > While I don't agree with the idea of posting a wish/whine list, > I think that it does show the degree of frustration felt by > the little guy who has to support the products sold by a > marketing guy to his upper management. > Thanks Mike for the support. To help state the obvious, I would like to add it's not a wish/whine list, but simply a wish list. I had no intention of turning it into a rant--however when have I been known for a short post? There was no intent for a discussion either, I simply asked for people to add to a list. :-) But it does make for lively discussion, and I think it's good--refreshing-- to see many of the formerly quiet and quiescent among c.d.i. put some energy towards that submit button, and speak. It is not easy for me to shoot rockets off in a church. It goes against my personal principles to engage in disparaging remarks, however, it apparently falls on deaf ears. Compliments or rockets seem to have absolutely no effect in furthering my cause, or anyone elses' here. If I'm nice I don't get any phone calls from the sales department anymore than if I'd say something bad. So why not let 'er rip. > Oh, I mispoke. If you happen to have a copy of Universal Server, > then you *ARE* in the beta test program. ;-) The summer of love will begin at the party. They're supposed to be giving out the NT version of Universal Server for attendees... Be sure to have your bell-bottoms and sandals ready to wear. > [LIBERAL toungue in cheek! 8^] [Shit eating grin] > > Just a few thoughts from your favorite Uncle! > > -Mikey Oh forgot to ask, can you renew my prescription? :-) I'm starting to babble again... > -- > #include <std_disclaimer.h> /* Mike Segel (MS385) */ > #include <No_Spam.h> > #ifdef OFFENDED_BY_CONTENT > The author takes no responsibility for this post. > Any resemblence to a coherent rational thought is purely coincidence. > -The Management. > #endif > ***************************** > Due to AGIS's Refusal to Act Responsibly > We are blocking all of their domains at the packet level. > This block will exist until AGIS modifies their policies to > conform to existing RFCs and net community standards. > > We encourage all ISPs and domain holders to do the same. > ***************************** -- Tim Schaefer \\\\|// tschaefe@mindspring.com (6 6) ------------------------oOOo---( )---o00o--------- http://www.inxutil.com