Re: Informix 5.0 vs. Java

On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Allan Gould wrote: } Dion Gillard wrote: } > } > In message <333F27E7.7E28@sco.com> - Allan Gould <allang@sco.com>Sun, 30 Mar } > 1997 18:56:39 -0800 writes: } > | Not sure whether this is within Windows or not. However, JDBC is really } > | a Windows oriented this as it's a Java extension to ODBC, which is } > What do you mean JDBC is Windows oriented? It is definitely NOT an extension } > to ODBC! } } OK, eating humble pie: bowing out of this one. } Admittedly, it had been a long day, but that's not excuse. } I can't even write English any more } } P.S. On the other hand, just wondering if I should throw a bit more fuel } onto the fire: } "JDBC might be viewed as an extension to ODBC?" Discuss. } JDBC is somewhat like odbc but its not an extension. The jdbc-odbc bridge if at all, can be viewed as an extension to odbc. I think you can find documentation on jdbc at www.javasoft.com. put the subject to rest please ! Chaminda Peries