Re: Informix and Oracle in the same shop

Nils.Myklebust@idg.no (Nils Myklebust) wrote: >chrise@shore.net (Chris Eastland) wrote: >About Universal Server: >:According to a recent Computerworld (I think) article, a lot already did. >:They found a lot of it to be vaporware, at best beta. >: >:c >Someone who is actually using it may want to comment on this. >If you or someone else could supply the actual issue (and magazine if >it wasn't Computerworld) I would be happy. See: 'Will the Real Universal Server Please Stand Up?' Computerworld March 31, 1997 This is probably the article referred to in the earlier post. It's actually two articles, one from Oracle's point of view, one from Informix. also: 'Users go Slow on Universal Server' Computerworld April 14, 1997 'Slow' is a reference to industry acceptance of the product, not the server performance. >Nils.Myklebust@idg.no >NM Data AS, P.O.Box 9090 Gronland, N-0133 Oslo, Norway >My opinions are those of my company >The Informix FAQ is at http://www.iiug.org Mary Travis BellSouth Telecommunications email: Mary.B.Travis@bridge.bellsouth.com