Re: Windows NT 3.51 Server migration to Windows NT 4.0 Beta 2 and INFORMIX Products

Jon C Vemo wrote: > > Tim - > > I've had both OnLine for NT and OnLine WrkGrp server running under > NT4.0Beta2. However I did not perform any significant stressing of the > engines. > Thanks! I was about to scrap it for something else. According to Mickey it didn't work... > OnLine for NT, is the OnLine DSA we have come to love. OnLine Wrkgrp is > basically a subset of DSA, without some features (I can't name them all, > but fragmentation/PDQ is one). > Well the intent of the machine in this particular case is more towards a Web Site, less towards a data warehouse. > As far as which one is best....I can't answer that. OnLine for NT, is a > full feature engine. The Workgroup server doesn't have all the bells and > whistles, but does have kind of a cute GUI admin tool. Personally I'd lean > towards OnLine for NT. > I've seen the PDF files from INFORMIX for the install, and it does look nice. Maybe I'll try them both out just to satisfy curiousity. In the long run, I hate to invest in something that will be shadowed by the December release of Universal Server. Shoot, now that July is here, we can all download that special edition of Workgroup Server. :-) > Jon > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon C. Vemo > jvemo@cyberspace.com > Bothell, WA USA > > ---------- - \\\\|// (6 6) ==============================---o00--(_)--00o---============================ Tim Schaefer tschaefe@encore.com tschaefe@shadow.net www.shadow.net/~tschaefe http://www.lp.org Liberty! http://www.cato.org =============================================================================