Re: NT server, pro/con

In article <D4668H.H9K@world.std.com>, shf@world.std.com (Stephen H Fick) says: > >I'm interested in hearing people's evaluation of the merits >and demerits of an NT server in a server/client RDB >environment. Speed, reliability, security, expandability, >ease of learning the system administration work, ease of >performing it--talking here about the NT side of things, >not the RDB side--are obvious areas of concern. Are there >others? How does NT stack up, to date? We have been running SQL Server on Windows NT 3.5 Server for about eight months. So far we are more more than pleased with its speed reliability, etc. Setup is very simple and quick. Hord to find areas of concern for optimization though, but there are some.