Re: Informix SE on "Raw" filesystems - bunk?

In article <4698cb$feh@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu> nmsteven@eukcumb1po.unitedkingdom.attgis.com "Neil M Stevenson" writes: > > I have now worked with Informix SE, Turbo, On-Line from version 1 (aaagh) > through to 5 (I know it's old, but I'm old fashioned) and I would tend to > agree with the comment "BUNK". I would really like you to show us how this > is done. I must admit if you can prove that you can run SE on a "raw" > file-system I will be impressed. > > However, "raw" file-system is a contradiction of terms, so how have you > interpreted this statement? A raw partition/slice does not have a > file-system on it, it is, well, RAW disk. > Do we have confusion between RAW & COOKED file systems/typed? -- ============================================================================ Sally Woolrich | This mail contains my personal sally@excelsis.demon.co.uk | views not those of my employer! ============================================================================