Re: 10.0 xC6

Hey Alexey, What is the HDR problem with xC5? I'm currently troubleshooting a long checkpoint problem with HDR configured and am wondering if the bug you are experiencing is related. Thanks, Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexey Sonkin" <alexeys@cidc.com> To: "Neil Truby" <neil.truby@ardenta.com>; <informix-list@iiug.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:29 PM Subject: RE: 10.0 xC6 > Hi, Neil, > > I started testing uc6/fc6 a few days ago, and ran > into a really bad problem: very big memory leak > in virtual memory segments. > > The strange thing is that 'onstat -g seg' shows, > that 800 MB is used in 6 virtual segments: > > onstat -g seg> > IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 10.00.UC6 -- On-Line (Prim) -- > Up 1 days 12:05:35 -- 1672528 Kbytes> > Segment Summary: > id key addr size ovhd class blkused blkfree > 88997892 1381451777 44000000 791068672 241036 R 193129 3 > 89030661 1381451778 7326c000 409600000 13152 V 99992 8 > 89063430 1381451779 8b90c000 102400000 3776 V 24999 1 > 89096199 1381451780 91ab4000 102400000 3776 V 24997 3 > 89128968 1381451781 97c5c000 102400000 3776 V 25000 0 > 89161737 1381451782 9de04000 102400000 3776 V 24999 1 > 89194506 1381451783 a3fac000 102400000 3776 V 2498 22502 > Total: - - 1712668672 - - 395614 22518 > > 'onstat -g mem' only shows about 100MB in total allocated from virtual > segments. Completely unclear, what happened to other 700MB... > > Same system (QA DB) was running without any problem under 10.0uc4, > and never allocated anything beyond the first V segment. > > Hope to file PMR on this problem to IBM shortly. > Actually, this is a 'level-1' problem: IDS 10.0uc6 is unusable > (at least, for us) > > As for xC5, it had a very bad problem with HDR. > I was happy, that problem is fixed in xC6 (I had PMR on that problem > with IBM) > > > ------------------------------------------ > Alexey Sonkin > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: informix-list-bounces@iiug.org > [mailto:informix-list-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of Neil Truby > Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 6:58 PM > To: informix-list@iiug.org > Subject: 10.0 xC6 > > Does anyone have any experiences - good or bad - on IDS 10.0xC6? > > We have several customers on FC5 and all seems fine so far. We have one > > moving from 32-bit (10.0UC4W3) to 64-bit and I'm trying to decide if to > move > them to FC5, or give FC6 a go. > > All opinion gratefully received! > > -- > Neil Truby t:01932 724027 > Director m:07798 811708 > Ardenta Limited e:neil.truby@ardenta.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list