Re: HELP : S.E (7.x) nearly faster than OWS (7.x)

I did a benchmark test a while ago , comapring WS , OL, SE . Using hp9000 , 1 GB ram , 2 CPU's . The test consisted of a simulation running a 4gl order entry application using benchmarking tool called Mercury Loadrunner. I run 10, 20 , 30, 40 and 50 user tests , bottom line was the difference was minimal OL was 1.01868 % faster then SE and same as WS . Note this is a OLTP app , DSS may be different ... Question how many CPU's do you have , my theory is that on 2 CPU machine there is little benefit , things change as you get into large databases and many CPU's .... I know PDQ is great for DSS ... Mariusz MARTIN <ramp@arrakis.es> wrote in article <35088D80.32CE70DB@arrakis.es>... > After the tuning of on Line Work Group Server 7.20UC2 in a Siemens > machine with 256 i have compared performance : S.E and OWGS have the > same performance . > > I can not understad . Do you? > > I have all in on line : buffer o.k , kaio , access to two disk , small > check point , temp dbspaces , raw devices >