Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS?
An RoR adaptor? :-P Seriously... Timmy the Tool and DA Maroon haven't a clue. The funny thing is that if you discount the swapping of customers. (ie customer X defected from this product while customer Y defected to *that* product....) You'll find that both IBM and Oracle will increase their markets by a large percentage of growth. It would be interesting to see if either company didn't increase their markets by 15-20%. Meaning that the markets for databases continues to grow. >From: Carsten Haese <carsten@uniqsys.com> >To: informix-list@iiug.org >Subject: Re: Is IBM actually doing something with IDS? >Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:22:07 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from perform.iiug.org ([216.177.38.211]) by >bay0-mc9-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Thu, 31 >May 2007 12:22:04 -0700 >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by perform.iiug.org >(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C11BA0CB;Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:53 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from perform.iiug.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (perform.iiug.org >[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 1zM9PLFG0YcQ; Thu, 31 >May 2007 15:21:47 -0400 (EDT) >Received: by perform.iiug.org (Postfix, from userid 60001)id 57610A088; >Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:46 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from perform.iiug.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by perform.iiug.org >(Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F5DA06C;Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:44 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by perform.iiug.org >(Postfix) with ESMTP id EA48DA056for <informix-list@iiug.org>; Thu, 31 May >2007 15:21:40 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from perform.iiug.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (perform.iiug.org >[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 6Kk1oKz8yV-h for ><informix-list@iiug.org>;Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:40 -0400 (EDT) >Received: by perform.iiug.org (Postfix, from userid 60001)id 0F28DA06C; >Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:40 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from sandbox.uniqsys.com (aegis.uniqsys.com [64.246.99.195])by >perform.iiug.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14007A056for ><informix-list@iiug.org>; Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:38 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from dot.uniqsys.com (dot.uniqsys.com >[192.168.20.200])(authenticated bits=0)by sandbox.uniqsys.com >(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) withESMTP id l4VJLXhM024007for ><informix-list@iiug.org>; Thu, 31 May 2007 15:21:33 -0400 >X-Message-Info: >LsUYwwHHNt1wyH5IvRZmeBtEcnQoxDM9scCEcjdvuncdWpFPPC5y1PZ4i130KhhY >X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iiug.org >X-Original-To: informix-list@iiug.org >Delivered-To: informix-list@iiug.org >X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iiug.org >X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 >References: ><mailman.24.1180426800.13675.informix-list@iiug.org><98_6i.12273$Tn.24@fe48.usenetserver.com><mailman.33.1180464146.13675.informix-list@iiug.org><2W07i.8776$Aj.8252@fe170.usenetserver.com><1180544003.292441.27290@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com><Sdi7i.31528$ys.7999@fe42.usenetserver.com><mailman.56.1180554155.13675.informix-list@iiug.org><epm7i.10551$Gj.5866@fe180.usenetserver.com><mailman.64.1180611461.13675.informix-list@iiug.org><UtD7i.27913$gw.15970@fe52.usenetserver.com><mailman.65.1180632977.13675.informix-list@iiug.org><U7E7i.18157$my.10893@fe28.usenetserver.com><mailman.67.1180636829.13675.informix-list@iiug.org><XVE7i.26805$Qk.25602@fe34.usenetserver.com> >Organization: Unique Systems, Inc. >X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) X-USI-MailScanner-Information: >Please contact the ISP for more information >X-USI-MailScanner: Found to be clean >X-MailScanner-From: carsten@uniqsys.com >X-BeenThere: informix-list@iiug.org >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 >Precedence: list >List-Id: "comp.databases.informix" <informix-list.iiug.org> >List-Unsubscribe: ><http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list>,<mailto:informix-list-request@iiug.org?subject=unsubscribe>; >List-Archive: <http://www.iiug.org/pipermail/informix-list>; >List-Post: <mailto:informix-list@iiug.org> >List-Help: <mailto:informix-list-request@iiug.org?subject=help> >List-Subscribe: ><http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list>,<mailto:informix-list-request@iiug.org?subject=subscribe>; >Errors-To: informix-list-bounces@iiug.org >Return-Path: informix-list-bounces@iiug.org >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2007 19:22:04.0461 (UTC) >FILETIME=[F8AAEDD0:01C7A3B8] > >On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:59 -0700, Tool wrote: > > Actually you said directly that I certainly didn't need more > > than 5 connections, and didn't need replication working. > >Please feel free to prove me wrong. I will now ask you for the third >time: How do the "alterations" in the IIUG version restrict your ability >to develop an IDS application? > >In other words: What kind of application are you developing that >requires more than 5 concurrent sessions and working replication during >development? > >-- >Carsten Haese >http://informixdb.sourceforge.net > > >_______________________________________________ >Informix-list mailing list >Informix-list@iiug.org >http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list _________________________________________________________________ PC Magazine's 2007 editors' choice for best Web mail'award-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507
So, is it logically Mikey the Moron? ;-) The funny thing is I know you _wanted_ to say something relevant but just couldn't muster something intelligent or even relevant. But it sounded good when you had that third or fourth drink didn't it? Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > An RoR adaptor? :-P > > Seriously... > > Timmy the Tool and DA Maroon haven't a clue. > > The funny thing is that if you discount the swapping of customers. > (ie customer X defected from this product while customer Y defected to > *that* product....) > You'll find that both IBM and Oracle will increase their markets by a > large percentage of growth. > It would be interesting to see if either company didn't increase their > markets by 15-20%. > Meaning that the markets for databases continues to grow. > >