Re: No primary keys
Posted in 2001
Topics: General Discussion
In the year of Our Lord Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:58:21 +1100, "Andrew Hamm" <ahamm@sanderson.net.au> broke a vow of silence to utter: >Mark D. Stock wrote in message <93iolg$li6$1@news.xmission.com>... >> >>You are already speaking to your lord and master at Informix on this >>subject. Whether he's illustrious or not I cannot say, but he can supply >>all the knowledge you need on these products. He's been at Informix >>longer than most of their products! :-) >> >Is he THAT old? I always imagined him to be a young dude, what with all his >vitality and sharp-eyed energy. He is indeed, and a mighty code warrior who should be revered and treated with respect.
In article <3a5d86f5.3246358@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, obnoxio@hotmail.com (Obnoxio The Clown) wrote: > In the year of Our Lord Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:58:21 +1100, "Andrew Hamm" > <ahamm@sanderson.net.au> broke a vow of silence to utter: > > >Mark D. Stock wrote in message <93iolg$li6$1@news.xmission.com>... > >> > >>You are already speaking to your lord and master at Informix on this > >>subject. Whether he's illustrious or not I cannot say, but he can supply > >>all the knowledge you need on these products. He's been at Informix > >>longer than most of their products! :-) > >> > >Is he THAT old? I always imagined him to be a young dude, what with all his > >vitality and sharp-eyed energy. > > He is indeed, and a mighty code warrior who should be revered and treated with > respect. > If Obnoxio says respect, now that's impressive ;) My personal opinion is that quite a few of the long time posters have earned the right to be treated respectfully due to their contributions. Not that you can't say you disagree, or think they are incorrect if you feel that way. I mean what's a newsgroup without arguments and discussion, but a little bit of respect can be used even in arguments ;) ... Will P.S. I apologize for the off-topic post. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
William Rice wrote in message <93kd64$7q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>... > >Will >P.S. I apologize for the off-topic post. > Huh? Why break with tradition?