Re: query performance
Posted in 2013
Fragmentation is the same...
Indexes are all detached. We are using cooked files on a SAN so who know
what the structure is... although I did re-create one of the main indexes
in the same space as the 'good' database, but that didn't change anything.
The SET EXPLAIN query plan looks the same.
I did not use the FORCE option. I will try that - I have been using
dostats, but it seems to complete very quickly so Im not positive it is
doing what I want. I think there is a new version since I downloaded last,
so I may try that as well.
This is the Query:
SELECT {++INDEX(VEHICLE_OWNER idx_vehownername)} SKIP 0 FIRST 60
vo_first_name ,vo_middle_name, vo_last_name, v_vin, v_veh_make ,
v_veh_model, v_veh_year ,vr_license_num,ad_county, ad_county_name
FROM vehicle_owner, vehicle, outer vehicle_reg, outer address
WHERE ((vo_owner_type='O' or vo_owner_type='E')
AND (vo_last_name >= 'ANDERSON' AND (case when vo_first_name < 'ADAM' AND
vo_last_name = 'ANDERSON' THEN 'f' ELSE 't' END)::boolean ))
AND vo_veh_id=v_veh_id
AND vo_veh_id=vr_veh_id
AND vo_addr_set_id=ad_addr_set_id
AND ad_addr_type='P'
ORDER BY vo_last_name, vo_first_name, vo_middle_name
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Art Kagel <art.kagel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Table and/or index fragmentation? Does one have attached indexes and the
> other one detached? (Attached indexes will show up in the output from
> dbschema -ss with the "IN TABLE" clause). Are the tables/indexes located> on different disk structures that may either be configured differently
> under the hood or experiencing different levels of load from external
> sources? Did you use the FORCE option when you updated statistics? If you
> run the query with SET EXPLAIN are the query plans different? How?
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel
> Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
> and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
> other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
> implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
> other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor
> those of the entities themselves.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Laurie Gustin <lgustin@utah.gov> wrote:
>
>> I have two databases that appear to be identical on the same server. The
>> data is only slightly different. I run the same query on both databases
>> and on one it finishes in 2 seconds... the other takes over 4 hours. I
>> have rebuilt indexes, and updated statistics but nothing seems to help.
>> Is there anything else I can look at to see why the difference in
>> performance?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laurie
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Informix-list mailing list
>> Informix-list@iiug.org
>> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
>>
>>
>