Re: It's not funny any more!

We are already running glibc-2.2.5-213. I assume that running a later version that -165 is OK? regards Malcolm --- Sandor Szabo <sandor.szabo@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Malcolm, > Please check the following web page: > > http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/informix/linux/ids.html > > This will give you the right hint! Your glibc > (libpthread) is not correct. > bye > Sandor > > > > > > > > malcolm weallans > > <malcolm.iiug@bto > > penworld.com> > To > Sent by: > informix-list@iiug.org > owner-informix-li > cc > st@iiug.org > > > Subject > It's not > funny any more! > 22.07.2004 15:51 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After my problems last week starting IDS 9.3 on SUSE > Linux (SLES 8) we decided to rebuild the client's > machine from the ground up. We reinstalled Linux > and > in the process removed passwd and group files. We > then installed IDS 9.40.UC3 and today I am trying to > get IDS to work. I did what I normally do. I > edited > the onconfig file and did an oninit -i. It wouldn't > come up. So I aborted everything, and started > again. > This time I did oninit -iv and it failed once again. > It gets to the bit about "Bringing up ADM VP" and > then > just hangs for ever. ps -ef | grep oninit shows > that > there are two oninit processes running, and the > second > one is eating cpu power. ipcs shows that two > segments > of shared memory have been allocated. > > In desperation I tried running onmonitor and ran > through parameters - initialize and went through all > the screens without making any changes. And this > time > it came up. > > I shutdow IDS by Take Offline and tried to run > oninit> -v again. Still it would not come up. > > Now I'm really baffled. > > I'll even offer a prize of some unworn Informix > T-shirts or polo-shirts to the person who can > unravel > this mystery. (The winner payes the postage! I'm > not > that generous!) > > regards > > Malcolm Weallans > sending to informix-list > > > sending to informix-list > sending to informix-list

malcolm weallans wrote: > We are already running glibc-2.2.5-213. I assume that > running a later version that -165 is OK? > That would be true if OSS didn't break backward compatibility... Unfortunately a lot of times it does. Nevertheless I don't know if that's your problem... Regards and good luck.