Re: Rollback
Posted in 2006
Colin Dawson wrote: > Solaris 9 > IDS 9.40.FC8 > > A developer ran an updare on a table with 152M rows as follows: > > begin work; > lock table in exclusive mode; > update <table> set <col> = 0 where <col> is null; > > The update would have updated 122M of the 152M. I have LTXHWM set to 45 > to prevent excessive transactions such as this, it hit this threshold > and aborted - long transaction as expected after about 90 minutes. > However, the rollback is taking an extremely long time, i.e. 3 hours to > process approximately less than half of the updated records. Is this > what is expected. When doing normal 'forward' processing, you are able to buffer the log records. However, when rolling back you have to read the logs via back chains. That takes longer. > > > > > Regards > > Colin > > There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary > and those that don't > > _________________________________________________________________ > Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free > newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters >