Re: IDS Next Version - features wanted.

Christopher said: > > That may have been true, once, but I doubt it is true for the most > part, anyway. More and more, the pointy-haired bosses make the > decisions and we geeks just get to implement their brilliant design. Oh, Christ, and f***ing how. I'm doing a very "special" gig at the moment where the bosses have decided that the best way to implement the project is using Microsoft Terminal Services. Unfortunately, the application they are trying to deploy was designed as a full-fat client/server application and consequently all sorts of bad shit happens when you consolidate stuff onto one server. But they don't have to worry about that, or the f***ing hoops the techies have to jump through because of their idiocy. Twats. -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche A smile is a gift that is free to the giver and precious to the recipient. But giving someone the finger is free too, and I find it more personal and sincere. sending to informix-list

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:53:24 +0100 (BST), "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@serendipita.com> wrote: > > >Christopher said: >> >> That may have been true, once, but I doubt it is true for the most >> part, anyway. More and more, the pointy-haired bosses make the >> decisions and we geeks just get to implement their brilliant design. > >Oh, Christ, and f***ing how. I'm doing a very "special" gig at the moment >where the bosses have decided that the best way to implement the project >is using Microsoft Terminal Services. > >Unfortunately, the application they are trying to deploy was designed as a >full-fat client/server application and consequently all sorts of bad shit >happens when you consolidate stuff onto one server. > >But they don't have to worry about that, or the f***ing hoops the techies >have to jump through because of their idiocy. > And if it performs poorly, it must be the techies' fault . . .