Re: Using Shared Libraries with INFORMIX-4GL
Posted in 1997
Topics: Connectivity: ESQL/C, 4GL & Embedded SQL, Third-Party Tools & Monitoring
Although I don't know how applicable this is to what you are doing, it might be worth stating that there is very poor (to almost non-existant) support for DataBlades that use shared libraries (especially third-party shared libraries). This seems to be an area where both the Illustra and IUS DataBlade APIs are especially weak. It has been over a year since we worked on this with Informix in the context of IUS, so I don't remember all the details, but I wouldn't expect this type of support anytime soon. Tanya Zimmerli (Former Product Manager for PLS Text DataBlade module) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tanya Zimmerli, Technical Manager Magnet Interactive Communications 202-471-5878 tanyaz@magnet.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On Wed, 3 Dec 1997 21:04:59 +0000, David Williams <djw@smooth1.demon.co.uk> wrote: >In article <663428$mam@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu>, "Ing. Melvin Perez >Cedano" <cam@codetel.net.do> writes >>Hi all! >> >>Could someone of you give me any pros and cons regarding to use -shared >>option of c4gl compiler? >> >>TIA >> > > Pros > ---- > > Less memory used > > Cons > ---- > Application startup can be slower as t needs to attach to the shared > libraries. > > Not always available (one of the machines at work does not support > them). > >-- >David Williams