Re: Year 2000 is NOT a leap year

Posted in 1997

Robert Sparks — 25 Jul 1997 20:37:42 GMT — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

In article <5r3jeq$2em@scottlee.mindspring.com>, The Dad <scottlee@mindspring.com> wrote: >I thought that the next term was 4000 (from something I read back when I >thought that this was interesting... it's been a while). Someone then >proceeded to correct me that this was an old wives' tail. I didn't know >for sure, so I shut up. probably the most prudent thing to do around someone who mistakes algorithms and anatomy... RjS