Re: database market share 2003
Enor P wrote: > Daniel Morgan wrote: > > >>Buck Nuggets wrote: >> >> >>>wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au (Noons) wrote in message >>>news:<73e20c6c.0406142335.272026fe@posting.google.com>... >>> >>> >>>>Absolute total and utter nonsense. SAP, Siebel, JD Edwards and many >>>>others were written FIRST for IBM mainframe environments. That is >>>>where their origin lies. To claim that they "moved away" from >>>>Oracle is the perfect definition of historical revisionism a-la IBM! >>> >>> >>>Will you get over it already? You're filling the newsgroups up with >>>crap - apparently out of some weird need to downplay IBM's market >>>share. >>> >>>Although an analysis of these trends is interesting - it certainly >>>isn't when subject to this kind of bullshit. >>> >>>Just let it go.... >>> >>>buck >> >>Buck ... your protest would be far more genuine if you just acknowledged >>the fact that what Noon wrote is correct. These systems all started on >>IBM mainframes. Ask me how I know. ;-) > > > Might be you know, but I donot care. Can you please shut up. Oracle poeple > like old women with wet under cloths. IBM people ... paranoid or neurotic ... incapable of understanding that someone might actually work with products from more than a single vendor. Translation into simple words: I am not an Oracle person. I don't work for Oracle, I've never worked for Oracle. I own no stock in Oracle and I work with multiple databases. The fact that there are no DB2 or Informix classes at the University of Washington is not my problem but rather is a reflection of lack of demand. Should I apologize for the lack of interest in your favorite product? No! -- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Daniel Morgan wrote: > Enor P wrote: > >> Daniel Morgan wrote: >> >> >>>Buck Nuggets wrote: >>> >>> >>>>wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au (Noons) wrote in message >>>>news:<73e20c6c.0406142335.272026fe@posting.google.com>... >>>> >>>> >>>>>Absolute total and utter nonsense. SAP, Siebel, JD Edwards and many >>>>>others were written FIRST for IBM mainframe environments. That is >>>>>where their origin lies. To claim that they "moved away" from >>>>>Oracle is the perfect definition of historical revisionism a-la IBM! >>>> >>>> >>>>Will you get over it already? You're filling the newsgroups up with >>>>crap - apparently out of some weird need to downplay IBM's market >>>>share. >>>> >>>>Although an analysis of these trends is interesting - it certainly >>>>isn't when subject to this kind of bullshit. >>>> >>>>Just let it go.... >>>> >>>>buck >>> >>>Buck ... your protest would be far more genuine if you just acknowledged >>>the fact that what Noon wrote is correct. These systems all started on >>>IBM mainframes. Ask me how I know. ;-) >> >> >> Might be you know, but I donot care. Can you please shut up. Oracle >> poeple like old women with wet under cloths. > > IBM people ... paranoid or neurotic ... incapable of understanding that > someone might actually work with products from more than a single > vendor. > > Translation into simple words: I am not an Oracle person. I don't work > for Oracle, I've never worked for Oracle. I own no stock in Oracle and > I work with multiple databases. The fact that there are no DB2 or > Informix classes at the University of Washington is not my problem but > rather is a reflection of lack of demand. Should I apologize for > the lack of interest in your favorite product? No! You are idiot. I want not to read this, is not do anything with infomrix. Is do with oracel and Db2. Is informix newsgroup. You not understand net manners? -- Enor