Re: Informix vs. Sybase vs. Oracle vs. (gasp) MS SQL Server

Posted in 1997

Gary L. Burnore — Tue, 02 Dec 1997 12:22:05 GMT — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

On Tue, 02 Dec 1997 17:53:32 +1000, Anthony Mandic <no_sp.am@agd.nsw.gov.au> wrote: :Gary L. Burnore wrote: :> :> On Tue, 02 Dec 1997 14:17:07 +1000, Anthony Mandic <no_sp.am@agd.nsw.gov.au> :> wrote: :> :> :Gary L. Burnore wrote: :> : :> :> So he's slanted and you're not. Right. :> : :> : And you're not too, right? :> :> I never said I wasn't. He did. Franlky I lijke all databases. :> Well except db2 oracle and anything from ms. :) : : ;-) Note, of course, that MS SQL Server is/was Sybase SQL : Server v4.2. Hey, I didn't say it was a logical or fair dislike, now did I? :) gburnore@netcom dot com or gburnore@netcom databasix com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- How you look depends on where you go. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary L. Burnore | '۳'''''''ۺ''''''''''۳ | '۳'''''''ۺ''''''''''۳ DOH! | '۳'''''''ۺ''''''''''۳ | '۳ 3 4 1 4 2 '' 6 9 0 6 9 '۳ spamgard(tm): zamboni | Official Proof of Purchase =========================================================================== PGPprint: C63B CF4E 1B71 4D7E C6F8 AF4E 338D 5CB4 KeyID: 0x0F7EDBD9 (RSA) finger gburnore@netcom.com for public key ---------------------------------------------------------------------------