Re: Split comp.databases.informix!

In article <TdYox0ElJPiD088yn@kcbbs.gen.nz>, kerry@kcbbs.gen.nz says... >There's been some talk via email suggesting we split comp.databases.informix >into more digestable chunks. I think this is a fine idea (I find myself >skipping more than I'm reading these days!) I find it quite easy to skip that which I don't want to read. (Fortunately I can read the group via a news server - I find it interesting that those on the mailing list and getting more "junk" seem to be the people most opposed to the proposal.) In any case, the volume of traffic in this group doesn't really justify splitting it into twelve (!) subgroups. Maybe .announce, .troubleshooting, .programming, and .misc - but again, the volume isn't -that- high. Myself, I don't see a lot of value in splitting the group. -- William Harris william@carsinfo.com CARS Information Systems 4000 Executive Park Drive Cincinnati, OH (USA) 45241