RE: Unattended ontape

-> -----Original Message----- -> From: Andrew Hamm [mailto:ahamm@mail.com] -> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:05 AM -> To: informix-list@iiug.org -> Subject: Re: Unattended ontape -> -> -> Simmons, Keith wrote: -> > -> -> > -> Andy Kent wrote: -> > -> > I thought unattended anything was expressly discouraged -> > -> with ontape? -> > -> -> > -> Unattended ontape is pure evil. [watch the accusations fly now!] -> > -> > See previous posts on the benefits of expect ! -> -> Expect cannot change the tape. Unless you have a tape library -> -> ********************************************************************************** This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message is free from such problems. ********************************************************************************** sending to informix-list