Re: spam was Re: default

On 8 Jul 97 at 16:57, Pablo Sanchez wrote: > > In article <5ptqn7$ble@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu>, johnl@informix.com > writes: > Yours, > Jonathan Leffler (johnl@informix.com) #include > <disclaimer.h> > PS: I decline to respond to messages with anti-spam > in the return path. > > Out of curiousity, why do you decline to respond (personally I > assume) to such messages? What's your logic? Jonathan is well-known around the world as a spammer of note. I guess he takes it as a personal insult when people try to stop him and those of his ilk... :-) (In case there's anyone out there completely devoid of a sense of humour, the above is a joke!) My personal feeling is that it's a pain in the ass to respond to someone asking for advice who then makes it difficult to respond to them. If someone is asking for help it's "rude" to make it difficult for people to help you. And yes, I get truckloads of spam as well. $0.02 -- Ciao, Billy Nose to the ground and ear to the grindstone in: Johannesburg, Murder Capital of the World!