Re: Point in time recovery

William Harris wrote: > > Even as heavily caveated as it is, this is still a better shot at recovery > from a disasterously erroneous SQL statement (such as "delete from table" with > a bad where clause) than the only way that was previously possible to try to > recover, eg, "backup post-disaster database, back it up again just in case, > restore pre-disaster database, unload table, restore post-disaster database" > (ick). Yup, I agree. That's why I wrote it. Glad you like it (in concept, anyway). Test it out, see if it works for you. I'd be glad to have some guinea pi-- er, I mean beta-testers. You'll want to know if it works before the first time you really need to use it. June