Re: Informix 7.3x Server agent extremely unreliable on NT
Posted in 1999
Topics: Platform-Specific Issues
Sorry if you took offence, but I was being serious. With KDE you can have a GUI like your used to (no long filenames). The fact that you can only do certain things when logged in as a certain user has definate security benefits and you can use something like kedit instead of vi. BTW, if you press the escape key, followed by ':q!' vi will exit without saving ':x' vi will exit and save any changes (There are other ways too). If you like I can email you a copy for NT so you can practice. On Thu, 02 Sep 1999, Axel Weitermann wrote: >oh yes, i really like to type endless pathnames, to ask every second the os >who I am right now, to let the os decide what I am allowed to do and >spending hours to get out of vi .... > >Mike Aubury <mike@aubit.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: >936216580.820283039@news.demon.co.uk... >> This sounds like an NT problem - ie your using it. >> Try a proper operating system like linux :-) >> >> >> On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, Axel Weitermann wrote: >> >On one NT machine the "server agent" stops responding after starting. >Since >> >7.31 it just writes 2 times "Read error occurred during connection >attempt" >> >into its log and then nothing else happens (in the log) no matter if I >stop >> >and restart the service. NT shows this service always as started. All I >can >> >do is restart the machine (up to 10 times) and hope that will work then. >> >Sometimes it starts up again. But the problem remains the same, when the >> >service needs to be stopped the next time. I have to do a lot of reboots >> >until it works again. >> > >> >With version 7.30.TC3 and TC6 it was quite similar. There were just 3 >> >differences: the service always wrote to its log, when it was started and >> >stopped, wrote the "Read error ...." message very often to the log and >> >sometimes (after a manual restart of the service) the strange message >"Not >> >owner" before it quits. >> > >> > >> >Thanks >> >Axel Weitermann
No, I wasn't offensed (as well as I also believe that my problem is a NT security problem - you shouldn't mess with NT security - it strikes back), just a joke, but I really don't like Unix, sorry.