paulm
Dualta O'Briain complained to Paul about being unable to reach a machine directly by its 192.168.5.225 address. Ian Goddard noted 192.168.x.x addresses are private and not routed on the wider internet. Dualta then said update statistics seemed to have worked, which does not obviously relate. Unclear exchange.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hi Paul, Another of those machines I cannot get to directly v210-11 (192.168.5.225) Is thers a routing table problem ? It's a bit of a pain in the butt.
Dualta O'Briain wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Another of those machines I cannot get to directly > > v210-11 (192.168.5.225) > > Is thers a routing table problem ? > > It's a bit of a pain in the butt. ouch.
Dualta O'Briain wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Another of those machines I cannot get to directly > > v210-11 (192.168.5.225) > > Is thers a routing table problem ? > > It's a bit of a pain in the butt. Addresses in the range 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.255.255 are private (intranet) addresses not to be routed onto the wider internet. -- Ian Hotmail is for spammers. Real mail address is igoddard at nildram co uk
Ian Goddard wrote: > Dualta O'Briain wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Another of those machines I cannot get to directly >> >> v210-11 (192.168.5.225) >> >> Is thers a routing table problem ? >> >> It's a bit of a pain in the butt. > > Addresses in the range 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.255.255 are private > (intranet) addresses not to be routed onto the wider internet. > I tried update statistics and it seems to have worked. :)