RE: Recommended Install Order (version 10)

I finally received my copy of version 10 (10.00 FC3R1). I just went through my "knowledge base" for the order of installation, as the latest version I've officially worked with, was version 9.21 Does the rule of TEN apply for installing version 10 ? I see from Art's reply below that people still follow the rule, even though it sounds like it doesn't really apply any longer, but I just want to check my facts properly. Dirk -----Original Message----- From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org [mailto:owner-informix-list@iiug.org] On Behalf Of Art S. Kagel Sent: 02 February 2005 04:21 PM To: informix-list@iiug.org Subject: Re: Recommended Install Order Dave Thacker wrote: Officially it no longer matters as then libraries and message files were, in theory at least, made independent by product so that installation clashes no longer exist. Practically, most of us still follow the rule of TEN (no Obnoxio, the SDK does not get installed last because of this rule but due to the version modifier rule:) but modified by a new rule introduced also some time ago, that newer versions (by version # not production date) of anything should be installed after earlier versions. So since the engine is 7.31 or 9.2/3/4 it gets installed after ISQL or I4GL which are only up to 7.31 (so if the engine is 7.31 rule of TEN overrides). Since the SDK is at version 9.81 (or at least the ESQL/C it contains is) or so it gets installed after the engine. Art S. Kagel > Once upon a time, in a galaxy before Obnoxio, (now you know it was a long time > ago ;) ), there was an install order for Informix products called TEN for > (t)ools, (e)ngines, (n)etworks. A year and a half ago, I found out that > the order had changed, but I don't recall what it was. So what would the > recommended order be for these products? > > I4gl development > I4gl runtime > r4gl development > interactive debugger > isql > ids 9.3 or 9.4 > > Thanks! sending to informix-list