Re: Y2K bug in esqlc function

Posted in 1999

David Williams — Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:35:32 +0000 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

In article <36DB6D9B.44B5@earthlink.net>, Jonathan Leffler <jleffler@earthlink.net> writes >I've lost track of which versions this bug is fixed in, but I'm a >little surprised to hear that it is in a version as late as 7.23.UC11 >(not to mention being surprised at a UC11 version number; I've often >wondered what happened after UC9...). If the version number is a How come versions number like 7.23.UC9 are still being produced when 7.24 exists, it fact why does 7.24 get new versions surely development should have stopped on 7.2x releases by now and 7.3x should be the only version when new releases are being created?? -- David Williams