Re: onarchive vs ontape

Posted in 1999

a_blonde@mindless.com — Fri, 20 Aug 1999 06:29:43 -0400 (EDT) — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

---- you wrote: > All, > > I know this might be a very old debate, but will some kind > soul give me a good excuse for not using onarchive. I'm > on 7.23 UW7 and don't have a 3rd party storage manager, so > it's ontape or onarchive. I need to convince others that > point-in-time recovery is not worth the effort of using > onarchive. It's also a very old version dude. Don't waste time justifying onarchive, justify an upgrade. If you upgraded to 7.3x you could use OnBar with ISM and never even worry about a 3rd party SM. AB ---------------------------------------------------------------- Get your free email from AltaVista at http://altavista.iname.com