Re: c4gl on Solaris 64-bit

"Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:T0Ikc.1344$Hs1.804@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > I noticed that a few days ago and read them the riot act - a > continuation of a rant started about, oh, seven years ago, but this > time with an externally imposed deadline for fixing it (since Linux > uses GCC, it has to be fixed soon). > So why does 4gl require writable strings?? > One day, the ESQL/C headers and generated code will compile cleanly > under excruciatingly tight warning levels too. try linting the C code some time! Why can't IBM fix this? Can we put it top of the requirements list..generate clean code.. > > -- > Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h> > Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com > Guardian of DBD::Informix v2003.04 -- http://dbi.perl.org/ >