Re: Superboer <superboer7@planet.nl>,

Sankaran said: > > Thanks for everyone who replied to my previous mail.... > > I now understand that there are no sbspaces in IDS 7.3. However, I > believve BLOBSPACES exist.... > > 1) Does BLOBSPACES exist in IDS 7.3? Yes. > 2) Can you point me to any IDS 7.3 documentation (or higher doc) which > says sbspaces are a new feature from a specific verion of IDS.\\ 9.2 release notes, probably. -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ` dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit controversial among modellers. --r937, dbforums.com sending to informix-list

if you read the 7.31 documentation it does notmake reference to a feature called sbspaces if you read the 9.4 documentation you will see it does make reference to a feature called sbspaces this is how it is documented that this feature is introduced in this version as obnoxio says you would need to go back some time to find the "new feature" list of 9 that introduced sbspaces. we have had 9.14, 9.21 9.30 and 9.40 Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > Sankaran said: > > > > Thanks for everyone who replied to my previous mail.... > > > > I now understand that there are no sbspaces in IDS 7.3. However, I > > believve BLOBSPACES exist.... > > > > 1) Does BLOBSPACES exist in IDS 7.3? > > Yes. > > > 2) Can you point me to any IDS 7.3 documentation (or higher doc) which > > says sbspaces are a new feature from a specific verion of IDS.\\ > > 9.2 release notes, probably. > > -- > Bye now, > Obnoxio > > "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ` dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" > - Coluche > > did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all > columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this > has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record > and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent > table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, > relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit > controversial among modellers. > > --r937, dbforums.com > sending to informix-list