Re: Informix left standing

Steven Hauser wrote: > > To me most of what Segel wrote was crap, but it did make the point > to me that after developing applications and administering > Informix for 8 years for multiple clients I still don't know > the acronym names of the product line sold by Informix. > > I obviously mislabeled 8.x for the OOP Datablade stuff in my 20 > minute EZ analysis of Informix marketing which confused Mr. Segel. Uh no, I wasn't confused by your EZ analysis. The point I was making is that you needed to ask and answer different questions. Also I pointed out that 7.x the PDQ technology has nothing to do with SMP machines. From the application standpoint, there is no way of telling how many CPUs are in a machine. So you are entitled to consider what I say as crap, but, before you make a comment, I suggest you show me the errors in my thought pattern. I also suggest you read a different set of marketing books. -- #include <std_disclaimer.h> /* Mike Segel (MS385) */ #include <No_Spam.h> #ifdef OFFENDED_BY_CONTENT The author takes no responsibility for this post. Any resemblence to a coherent rational thought is purely coincidence. -The Management. #endif ***************************** * Attention * -*- Due to AGIS's Refusal to Act Responsibly -*- Due to ACSI's Refusal to Act Responsibly We are blocking all of their domains at the packet level. This block will exist until they modify their policies to conform to existing RFCs and net community standards. We encourage all ISPs and domain holders to do the same. *****************************