RE: different ROOTNAME

Posted in 1999

Rick Rabe — Wed, 30 Jun 1999 06:33:15 -0500 — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BEC2EC.3B95C544 Content-Type: text/plain None I'm aware of. We run several instances on 4 machines with 2 different OSes and none use the default rootdbs. HTH rrabe > ---------- > From: Gursoy YERLI[SMTP:gursoy@ata.net] > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 4:15 PM > To: Informix List > Subject: different ROOTNAME > > Hi folks, > > Just a simple question. > > Are there any negative consequences (or drawbacks) of using different > root dbspace name (ROOTNAME) other other than default "rootdbs"? > > Thank you. > > Gursoy YERLI > ------_=_NextPart_001_01BEC2EC.3B95C544 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2448.0"> <TITLE>RE: different ROOTNAME</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> None I'm aware = of. We run several instances on 4 machines with 2 different OSes and = none use the default rootdbs. HTH rrabe <UL> ---------- From:   = Gursoy = YERLI[SMTP:gursoy@ata.net] Sent:   = Tuesday, June 29, 1999 4:15 = PM To: =     Informix = List Subject: =        different ROOTNAME Hi folks, Just a simple question. Are there any negative consequences = (or drawbacks) of using different root dbspace name (ROOTNAME) other = other than default "rootdbs"? Thank you. Gursoy YERLI </UL> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01BEC2EC.3B95C544--