Re: Transaction logging in SE
Posted in 1994
> > OnLine and SE both support transactions but there are differences. SE > does *not* support: > > - rollback of DDL statements (although they are logged and > rollforward will use them) > - shared (read-only) locks, so SET ISOLATION is not available on SE > > Can anyone think of other differences (besides DBA stuff like tbtape)? > > Maybe their product depends on some of these features. As far as I'm aware the product uses *none* of these features. Would anyone from Informix care to comment on the authors claims? ---------------------------------------------------- These opinions are mine; if you want them, take them ---------------------------------------------------- Stuart Hemming | shemminga@cix.compulink.co.uk The Data Base | +(44) 1602 250005 Nottingham UK | ----------------------------------------------------