Re: onstat and tbstat
Posted in 1998
Does hard link files consume spaces? or the same same with two names? I'm
thinking to delete them or symbolic link them.
Nien
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart_Knight@lendlease.com.au <Stuart_Knight@lendlease.com.au>
To: Sui <Sui>
Date: Monday, April 06, 1998 03:30 =E5
Subject: Re: onstat and tbstat
>
>
>
>
>Note: Some recipients have been dropped due to syntax errors.
>SMTP Headers are unavailable for viewing due to server configuration.
>
>
>
> The tbxxxx files are EXACTLY THE SAME FILES as the onxxxx versions =
-
> they are Hard Links.
>
> If you do an "ls -li", you will notice that they have the same inod=
e,
> I think Informix left them like this, so as to ease the transition =
for
> people upgrading from 5 to 7.
>
> When version 7 is installed, these links are created automatically =
by
> the installation (See the $INFORMIXDIR/etc/onlinefiles).
>
> Regards.
>
> Stuart.
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________=
___
>_____
>Subject: onstat and tbstat
>Author: "ANTS" <sui@naseej.com> at LEND LEASE/LLAP
>Date: 05/04/98 18:27
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We have just upgraded from 5.x to 7.x. Those tbxxxx files are now
> onxxxx
> files,
> but they still exist lots of tbxxxx like tbstat, tbmonitor, and so
> on, are
> these files different from the new version onstat and onmonitor or
> they are
> the
> just the same but with different names??
>
> I read some where that Informix put these files for convenience and
> will not
> support them in future versions (we are still in 7.13)
>
> I would like to delete those tb* files, any harm???
>
>
> Nien
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>