Oninit cdi / Archive
Talk to an expert →

RE: number of extents

Posted in 2001

Topics: Storage & Space Management, Versions, Editions & End-of-Life

Parker, Jack — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

> From: Neil Truby [mailto:ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk] > > Parker, Jack <JParker@engage.com> wrote in message > news:959mk7$c25$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > > > Careful with that first size. Index space allocation is > made according to > > fextsize. > > Not in IDS 9.2x, although I take the point that the original > question was > about 7.31. I can't speak to this. Although I gather that an index storage clause is in the offing for future releases. > > > Philip sagely spake these words of wisdom > > Is this a tautology? Maybe not. > I thought it was very thymely. cheers j.

↪ replying to Parker, Jack
Andrew Hamm — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

Parker, Jack wrote in message <95c3qa$783$1@news.xmission.com>... > >I thought it was very thymely. Shame on you. I think you need to get some sleep.

↪ replying to Parker, Jack
Obnoxio The Clown — — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

In the year of Our Lord Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:35:14 -0500, "Parker, Jack" <JParker@engage.com> spake, saying: >> From: Neil Truby [mailto:ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk] >> >> Parker, Jack <JParker@engage.com> wrote in message >> news:959mk7$c25$1@news.xmission.com... >> > >> > >> > Careful with that first size. Index space allocation is >> made according to >> > fextsize. >> >> Not in IDS 9.2x, although I take the point that the original >> question was >> about 7.31. > >I can't speak to this. Although I gather that an index storage clause is in >the offing for future releases. > >> >> > Philip sagely spake these words of wisdom >> >> Is this a tautology? Maybe not. > >I thought it was very thymely. No need to pepper your posts with these observations. You might get assaulted.

Glossary