Re: oncheck -me

Keith, Thanks for the information. A CDI search on RASHELP did bring up the thread from Oct 2003.

"Dave Griffen" <dgriffen@nospam.finishline.com> wrote in message news:chpr4a$ej4$1@news.onecall.net... > Keith, > > Thanks for the information. A CDI search on RASHELP did bring up the thread > from Oct 2003. > > From the looks of it, this is still NOT a documented or supported feature. > The Migration Guide just tells you to use it, none of the guides tell you > how to use it. The writers of the Migration Guide have probably been sacked > for even mentioning it in print. Most likly... > > Dave > > "Simmons, Keith" <keith.simmons@office2office.biz> wrote in message > news:chp6n4$7ck$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > Dave > > > > oncheck -me was an undocumented and unsupported option intended only> > for use by Tech Support in order to resolve upgrade problems. There > > were a couple of threads regarding it in Sept/Oct 2003. It also needs > > RASHELP set souse that to search as well. > > As it is now documented I assume it must be supported but be careful. > > Originally the command was not logged, could not be rolled back, was not > > completed internally and was not completely safe. > > I have run it in a test environment on data tables, never on system > > tables and I cannot remember the locking (if any !! ). > > > > Keith > > > > >

"Madison Pruet" <mpruet@comcast.net> wrote in message news:2%%%c.163069$mD.122146@attbi_s02... > > "Dave Griffen" <dgriffen@nospam.finishline.com> wrote in message > news:chpr4a$ej4$1@news.onecall.net... > > Keith, > > > > Thanks for the information. A CDI search on RASHELP did bring up the > thread > > from Oct 2003. > > > > From the looks of it, this is still NOT a documented or supported feature. > > The Migration Guide just tells you to use it, none of the guides tell you > > how to use it. The writers of the Migration Guide have probably been > sacked > > for even mentioning it in print. > > Most likly... Or at least the folks that suggested putting in into the docs.... ;-) > > > > > Dave > > > > "Simmons, Keith" <keith.simmons@office2office.biz> wrote in message > > news:chp6n4$7ck$1@news.xmission.com... > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > oncheck -me was an undocumented and unsupported option intended only> > > for use by Tech Support in order to resolve upgrade problems. There > > > were a couple of threads regarding it in Sept/Oct 2003. It also needs > > > RASHELP set souse that to search as well. > > > As it is now documented I assume it must be supported but be careful. > > > Originally the command was not logged, could not be rolled back, was not > > > completed internally and was not completely safe. > > > I have run it in a test environment on data tables, never on system > > > tables and I cannot remember the locking (if any !! ). > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > >