Re: initializing shared memory
Posted in 1996
In article <DyCqt6.FMw@cix.compulink.co.uk>, "\\"Malcolm Weallans\\"" <onlinedbc@cix.compulink.co.uk> writes >David Williams wrote: >> In article <Dy5noo.CsH@cix.compulink.co.uk>, "\\"Malcolm Weallans\\"" >> <onlinedbc@cix.compulink.co.uk> writes >> >> Gene Terry Sanford <tsanford@csti-md.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> :We are runnning informix 4.1 on SCO OpenSever 5.02. >> >> :When we run tbinit to initialize shared memory we get >> >> :the following error: >> >> >> >> : tbinit: shmat[EINVAL][22]: shared memory base address >> >> : illegal using 0x80480000, needs 0x80000000 >> >> : tbinit: fatal error in shared memory creation. >> >> >> >> :Our tbconfig file has SHMBASE = 0x80400000 >> >> :Anyone have any idea what the problem is. It sounds like the >> >> :shared memory base address for SCO needs to be changed. >> >Have you tried modifying SHMBASE to Ox80000000? >> > >> >I have installed a number of SCO UNIX systems at different levels and >> >found that to be necessary. But don't ask me why? >> > >> > >> >Malcolm Weallans >> >Online Database Consultancy >> >Phone 01628-72154 >> >Fax 01628-37463 >> >CIX - onlinedbc >> >> It is the address that each VP uses to attach the first segment of >> shared memory to it's own virtual address space. That is the address to >> which it maps the first segment of shared memory. This needs to be set >> such that is does not collide with >> >> a) Text segments which store code. >> b) Data segments which store static/global segments >> c) The stack segment (which can grow with the stack as nested >> function are called). >> d) Other data segments where the heap is stored which grow as memory >> is malloc'ed. >> >> Different UNIX's map a)-d) at different address and so different >> SHMBASE's are needed to avoid collisions of memory segments. >> >> Note some UNIX's support a value of 0 which means the UNIX kernel will >> choose the correct value automatically. Clearly SCO is not one of >> those. >> >> -- >> David Williams >I would point out that the user is using 4.1 which does not have VPs. My >answer still stands. >Sorry David. > >Malcolm Weallans >Online Database Consultancy >Phone 01628-72154 >Fax 01628-37463 >CIX - onlinedbc :%s/VP/sqlturbo/g (Subsitute sqlturbo for VP) -- David Williams