Re: Database market share 2004

Paul <paulsnewsgroups@hotmail.com> writes: > That has to be market share in some shape or form, but was > completely ignored in the article which only mentioned PostgreSQL, > and even then only provided a link, with no mention of its market > share! It is also an unmeaningful question in that the notion of "market share" is difficult to formulate for a piece of software which, since it does not have any organization that owns the right to licensing fees, doesn't realistically factor in to have a well-defined notion of either "market" or "share" of that market. If it isn't "sold," then using the term "market" is misleading, at best... -- "cbbrowne","@","ca.afilias.info" <http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>; Christopher Browne (416) 673-4124 (land)