Re: 4Js - any good?

"Ralph Davis" <ralphd@datapac.com> wrote: >As the distributor in the US, unable to sell to you, I'll tell you it is >all that they say it is and 4J's technical staff is outstanding. We've >worked with 4J's for over a year now and we do not have a customer that is >dissatisfied. > >Ralph H. Davis >President, LTG, Inc. (www.leadtogold.com) Well, even if it is not a respond to my post, I feel like saying "thank you". We can only wish that somebody from Informix, with the same title like yours, do the same thing, and be able to say the same. Before and after the "Informix on Linux" thing, I have seen questions like this. Maybe, the point is in supporting developers, and low(er)-end market, and 4GL (4js) can be that. On w95, NT, Linux'? This is obviously not only about engines. Can you comment on this, and make us all more acquainted with 4js? Can you point out some resources about 4js, other then yours, and 4js www sites. I must say, there is not a lot info on them. Can you influence 4js to port to Linux, or at least give us some demo or trial SW to see what this is all about? Andrej Falout >Chris Jakeman <cjakeman@apvpeter.demon.co.uk> wrote in article ><znazqTABn$fzEwYx@apvpeter.demon.co.uk>... >> Can anyone comment on the 4Js? >> >> Does the compiler have any major problems? >> Is the company easy to work with? >> >> Any advice would be welcome. >> >> >> Chris Jakeman >> #include<std.disclaimer.h> **************************************************************** * Andrej Falout, RDBMS R&D, Croatia, Europe, afalout@zg.tel.hr * *--------------------------------------------------------------* * If you can read, You can do it ! * ****************************************************************