Re: SQL question
Posted in 1996
Hi,
In <54irr4$jir@cssun.mathcs.emory.edu> elderbox@teleport.com (elderbox@teleport.com) wrote:
> On 17 Oct 1996, rickt wrote:
>
> > If I have the following SQL
> > select column1, count(*) from tablefoo
> > group by column1> >
> > It returns 24 rows with various counts.
> >
> > Is there a way to return just the number of rows that would have been
> > returned. (ie just the number 24)
> > I know I could put it in a temp table and then count that but, yuk
> >
>
> Hmmmm, kinda interesting to me. Initial reaction was to just use count(*)
> to devine the number of rows until I realized that perhaps you are
> grouping to differentiate some rows from others? Does that work? Why not
> just select count(*) from foo with no group by if all you want is a
> count?
>
>
>
>
> elderbox@teleport.COM Public Access User --- Not affiliated with Teleport
> Public Access UNIX and Internet at (503) 220-1016 (2400-28800, N81)
>
What about
select count( distinct column1 ) from tablefoo ? :)
Best regards,
Julian.
--
Julian S. Zalutsky
MIS, "Brestcombank"
Brest, Republic of Belarus
-- E-mail: julian@martcom.belpak.brest.by