Arcchecker
A user on IDS 10.0 UC5 tried a table-level restore with archecker and hit an error saying the target table doesn't exist; he asked whether the target table must be created beforehand (given the schema file needs CREATE TABLE statements for both source and target), and whether archecker performs well or has faster alternatives. The thread is mostly off-topic banter mocking his use of the word 'performant'; one reply asked him to post his command and schema file and pointed to John Miller III's presentations on iiug.org, noting the manual lacks detail. No actual answer or resolution is recorded.
Auto-generated by DrWatson from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hello, IDS 10.0 UC5 Attempting to use archecker to do a table level restore and getting an error saying my target table doesn't exist. Wondering if the target table has to be explicitly created before running the archecker job? Seems to be a simple question, however, the schema file used with archecker requires "Create Table" statements for both source and target tables. Is archecker considered to be performant? Faster alternatives? Thanks, Tam.
Tam O'Shanter said: > Is archecker considered to be performant? Dear Tam O'Shanter, Please go away until you have learned how to use the English language. -- Bye now, Obnoxio "... no bill is required as no value was provided." -- Christine Normile -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.
Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > Tam O'Shanter said: >> Is archecker considered to be performant? > > Dear Tam O'Shanter, > > Please go away until you have learned how to use the English language. > Quickerer?
TBP said: > Obnoxio The Clown wrote: >> Tam O'Shanter said: >>> Is archecker considered to be performant? >> >> Dear Tam O'Shanter, >> >> Please go away until you have learned how to use the English language. >> > Quickerer? More quicker, you moron... :o| -- Bye now, Obnoxio "... no bill is required as no value was provided." -- Christine Normile -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.
Sorry. Didn't realize that word was a sore spot with you. I will repent. And, any advice on the archecker question? "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@serendipita.com> wrote in message news:mailman.265.1163528865.29126.informix-list@iiug.org... > > Tam O'Shanter said: >> Is archecker considered to be performant? > > Dear Tam O'Shanter, > > Please go away until you have learned how to use the English language. > > -- > Bye now, > Obnoxio > > "... no bill is required as no value was provided." > -- Christine Normile > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is > believed to be clean. >
Tam, You did not include the commands or file you used to run the TLR. Post this information and maybe we can help. Also look on the www.iiug.org. John Miller III has several presentations that show how to use this feature. The manual is lacking some detail and his presentation will bring everything together. FYI Tam O'Shanter wrote: > Hello, > > IDS 10.0 UC5 > > Attempting to use archecker to do a table level restore and getting an error > saying my target table doesn't exist. > > Wondering if the target table has to be explicitly created before running > the archecker job? > > Seems to be a simple question, however, the schema file used with archecker > requires "Create Table" statements for both source and target tables. > > Is archecker considered to be performant? Faster alternatives? > > Thanks, > > Tam.
Tam O'Shanter said: > Sorry. > > Didn't realize that word was a sore spot with you. > > I will repent. > > And, any advice on the archecker question? What was the question again? I saw the p-word, and my brain jumped out of my ears and bludgeoned itself against the wall in frustration. > "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@serendipita.com> wrote in message > news:mailman.265.1163528865.29126.informix-list@iiug.org... >> >> Tam O'Shanter said: >>> Is archecker considered to be performant? >> >> Dear Tam O'Shanter, >> >> Please go away until you have learned how to use the English language. >> >> -- >> Bye now, >> Obnoxio >> >> "... no bill is required as no value was provided." >> -- Christine Normile >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Informix-list mailing list > Informix-list@iiug.org > http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is > believed to be clean. > -- Bye now, Obnoxio "... no bill is required as no value was provided." -- Christine Normile -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.