Oninit cdi / Archive
Talk to an expert →

ER failures between IDS 10.0.FC4 and IDS 10 9.40.UC5

Posted in 2006

Topics: High Availability & Replication, Installation, Setup & Upgrades, Logging & Checkpoints, Platform-Specific Issues, Versions, Editions & End-of-Life

Dana Carney — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Last night we upgraded some of our database severs to IDS 10.0.FC4 from IDS 10.0.FC3 and are getting the following errors from our servers that are running IDS 9.40.UC5: IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC5 -- On-Line -- Up 01:19:19 -- 2524160 Kbytes Message Log File: /usr/informix/log/online94.prod 09:07:48 Checkpoint loguniq 25366, logpos 0x7a7f58c, timestamp:0xe5e6f2a5 09:07:48 Maximum server connections 15 09:10:11 Buffers recvd <56> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3461428/0x1) 09:10:11 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:10:26 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:01 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3557548/0x1) 09:11:01 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:16 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:37 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x377b428/0x1) 09:11:37 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:52 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> The other servers in this ER scheme aren't having these issues, just the servers that are still on 9.40. There are also associated ATS failures which aren't shown in this portion of the log. Unfortunately we are unable to upgrade this server to IDS 10 because we would have to upgrade the OS from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8 and this server runs legacy applications that would not run on the newer OS. Has anybody else seen this type of behavior? Thanks in advance, -Dana Dana Carney III | Sr. Database Administrator/Team Lead | Intraware | 925-253-6554 Manage Complex Entitlements, Enhance Customer Visibility, Accelerate Profits Any transaction terms in or attached to this message are proposals and are subject to the parties' signature of a definitive written agreement.

↪ replying to Dana Carney
Madison Pruet — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Dana, Have you opened a case yet with tech support? There was a problem with identity on the V10 server. I think that we may need an environment variable set if we have a mix of xC3 vrs xC4. You might want to check the xC4 release notes. M.P. "Dana Carney" <dcarney@intraware.com> wrote in message news:mailman.591.1140197972.740.informix-list@iiug.org... Last night we upgraded some of our database severs to IDS 10.0.FC4 from IDS 10.0.FC3 and are getting the following errors from our servers that are running IDS 9.40.UC5: IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC5 -- On-Line -- Up 01:19:19 -- 2524160 Kbytes Message Log File: /usr/informix/log/online94.prod 09:07:48 Checkpoint loguniq 25366, logpos 0x7a7f58c, timestamp: 0xe5e6f2a5 09:07:48 Maximum server connections 15 09:10:11 Buffers recvd <56> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3461428/0x1) 09:10:11 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:10:26 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:01 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3557548/0x1) 09:11:01 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:16 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:37 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x377b428/0x1) 09:11:37 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:52 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> The other servers in this ER scheme aren't having these issues, just the servers that are still on 9.40. There are also associated ATS failures which aren't shown in this portion of the log. Unfortunately we are unable to upgrade this server to IDS 10 because we would have to upgrade the OS from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8 and this server runs legacy applications that would not run on the newer OS. Has anybody else seen this type of behavior? Thanks in advance, -Dana Dana Carney III | Sr. Database Administrator/Team Lead | Intraware | 925-253-6554 Manage Complex Entitlements, Enhance Customer Visibility, Accelerate Profits Any transaction terms in or attached to this message are proposals and are subject to the parties' signature of a definitive written agreement.

↪ replying to Dana Carney
Madison Pruet — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Dana --- What level is CDRID 1 on? The source count (buffers sent) is counted on the source and sent to the target. So it's important to know the source level. Thanks. "Dana Carney" <dcarney@intraware.com> wrote in message news:mailman.591.1140197972.740.informix-list@iiug.org... Last night we upgraded some of our database severs to IDS 10.0.FC4 from IDS 10.0.FC3 and are getting the following errors from our servers that are running IDS 9.40.UC5: IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC5 -- On-Line -- Up 01:19:19 -- 2524160 Kbytes Message Log File: /usr/informix/log/online94.prod 09:07:48 Checkpoint loguniq 25366, logpos 0x7a7f58c, timestamp: 0xe5e6f2a5 09:07:48 Maximum server connections 15 09:10:11 Buffers recvd <56> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3461428/0x1) 09:10:11 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:10:26 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:01 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3557548/0x1) 09:11:01 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:16 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:37 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x377b428/0x1) 09:11:37 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:52 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> The other servers in this ER scheme aren't having these issues, just the servers that are still on 9.40. There are also associated ATS failures which aren't shown in this portion of the log. Unfortunately we are unable to upgrade this server to IDS 10 because we would have to upgrade the OS from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8 and this server runs legacy applications that would not run on the newer OS. Has anybody else seen this type of behavior? Thanks in advance, -Dana Dana Carney III | Sr. Database Administrator/Team Lead | Intraware | 925-253-6554 Manage Complex Entitlements, Enhance Customer Visibility, Accelerate Profits Any transaction terms in or attached to this message are proposals and are subject to the parties' signature of a definitive written agreement.

↪ replying to Madison Pruet
Madison Pruet — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

Bug 176131 --- workarround described in the bug description. Patch shortly available. M.P. "Madison Pruet" <mpruet@comcast.net> wrote in message news:69ydnUbDQuu6_WbeRVn-pA@comcast.com... Dana --- What level is CDRID 1 on? The source count (buffers sent) is counted on the source and sent to the target. So it's important to know the source level. Thanks. "Dana Carney" <dcarney@intraware.com> wrote in message news:mailman.591.1140197972.740.informix-list@iiug.org... Last night we upgraded some of our database severs to IDS 10.0.FC4 from IDS 10.0.FC3 and are getting the following errors from our servers that are running IDS 9.40.UC5: IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.UC5 -- On-Line -- Up 01:19:19 -- 2524160 Kbytes Message Log File: /usr/informix/log/online94.prod 09:07:48 Checkpoint loguniq 25366, logpos 0x7a7f58c, timestamp: 0xe5e6f2a5 09:07:48 Maximum server connections 15 09:10:11 Buffers recvd <56> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3461428/0x1) 09:10:11 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:10:26 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:01 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x3557548/0x1) 09:11:01 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:16 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> 09:11:37 Buffers recvd <58> not equal to buffers sent <1> for KEY(1/25544/0x377b428/0x1) 09:11:37 CDR connection to server lost, id 1, name <sc_prod1> Reason: connection lost 09:11:52 CDR: Re-connected to server, id 1, name <sc_prod1> The other servers in this ER scheme aren't having these issues, just the servers that are still on 9.40. There are also associated ATS failures which aren't shown in this portion of the log. Unfortunately we are unable to upgrade this server to IDS 10 because we would have to upgrade the OS from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8 and this server runs legacy applications that would not run on the newer OS. Has anybody else seen this type of behavior? Thanks in advance, -Dana Dana Carney III | Sr. Database Administrator/Team Lead | Intraware | 925-253-6554 Manage Complex Entitlements, Enhance Customer Visibility, Accelerate Profits Any transaction terms in or attached to this message are proposals and are subject to the parties' signature of a definitive written agreement.

Glossary