Re: Database with buffered and unbuffered log.

Posted in 2003

Robert A. Reissaus — 12 Sep 2003 06:36:28 -0700 — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix

"Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.09.09.13.41.20.171091.10594@bloomberg.net>... > I NEVER use BUFFERED log. Yes it is a bit faster, but I like my data. Besides > <grinn from ear to ear> I figure the DBAs using BUFFERED LOG are the same ones > using RAID5. Since I only use RAID10 I figure I'm still running faster than > they are <snicker>. ;-) > > Art S. Kagel I could hear you laughing all the way down in Amsterdam. Robert A. Reissaus RISDI Ibm/Informix Consultants Amsterdam, the Netherlands r.a.reissaus@risdi.com www.risdi.com